Define the supplied material and the finished condition
Sandvik describes machinability as involving chip formation, cutting-edge wear and the ability to machine the workpiece, with effects from material structure, heat treatment, hardness and operating conditions. It is not a single material constant. Two parts called stainless steel may therefore need different tools and routes. Even the same alloy can require a different plan when its condition or stock form changes. [2]
Start the RFQ with the full alloy designation, material specification and applicable edition, product form and supplied condition. Separately state the required final condition. Identify customer source restrictions and whether material certificates or other traceability records must accompany the order. Do not ask a shop to infer these requirements from a shorthand label in a model filename.
Titanium: pay attention to the cutting zone
NIST's titanium-machining research describes low thermal conductivity and tool-chip interactions as challenges in machining titanium alloys. These mechanisms help explain why a process developed for a different metal should not simply be reused with the alloy name changed. Temperature, cutting conditions and tool behavior belong in the manufacturing review. This is a qualitative comparison, not a cutting-speed recommendation. [3]
For a titanium part, identify the exact grade, specification and condition; do not let the generic word titanium stand in for a purchase definition. Highlight thin walls, deep pockets and sections where distortion would affect assembly. Ask the quotation to identify any material or process assumptions that need engineering approval. If the part has a critical surface, specify the required acceptance condition and reporting rather than requesting that it merely look smooth.
Inconel: identify the alloy and heat-treatment route
Inconel is a family name, not a complete grade designation. Special Metals identifies INCONEL alloy 718 as an age-hardenable nickel-chromium alloy and discusses machining or fabrication before the final required heat treatment. Its bulletin also makes clear that typical published property values are not specification limits. Use the exact alloy and governing procurement requirements rather than copying a typical-data table into an acceptance plan. [4]
Clarify whether the quote begins with annealed stock or material already in its final aged condition. Identify who is responsible for heat treatment, any required approved processor and the records that must return with the parts. Ask which dimensions will be finished or verified after that step. This keeps a potentially important operation from disappearing between the material purchase and final inspection responsibilities.
17-4 PH: the condition belongs beside the grade
17-4 PH is a precipitation-hardening stainless steel. Carpenter's Custom 630 Project 70+ data show separate machining recommendations for solution-treated and several aged conditions. That demonstrates why condition matters, but Project 70+ is a particular product and its data should not be presented as a universal recipe for every 17-4 source. [5]
State the required final condition explicitly and distinguish it from the condition of the incoming bar or plate. If the drawing permits more than one route, ask the shop to describe the proposed sequence. For replacement parts, do not identify a stainless alloy or its aging condition from appearance alone. Use the controlled design information and required material documentation to resolve uncertainty before making chips.
Aluminum: avoid treating every alloy alike
Sandvik groups aluminum with nonferrous materials but points out that composition changes cutting behavior, including the abrasiveness associated with higher silicon content. Material adhesion and the choice of a suitable sharp cutting geometry also matter. A wrought alloy and an aluminum casting therefore should not be assumed to behave identically simply because both are aluminum. [2]
Provide the alloy and temper as well as the product form. For plate or billet, identify the actual stock thickness and any restrictions on substitution. For a casting, include the drawing for the supplied blank when available. If anodizing or another finish follows machining, state which specification governs it and how the final dimensions are accepted. Ask the supplier to identify any coating allowance assumptions instead of leaving them implicit.
Compare the questions, without invented ratings
| Material | Process concern | Information to provide |
|---|---|---|
| Titanium alloy | Heat and tool-chip behavior | Exact grade, condition and critical surfaces |
| Inconel alloy | Grade and heat-treatment sequence | Alloy number, supplied state and final requirements |
| 17-4 PH | Condition-dependent machining plan | Incoming and final aging conditions |
| Aluminum alloy | Composition, temper and product form | Alloy, temper, blank definition and finish specification |
These categories summarize the cited manufacturer and research guidance; they are not a ranking of cost or achievable tolerance. A quotation must still address geometry, quantity, tooling, inspection and the supplied material. Do not infer a guaranteed lead time or surface finish from the table.
Make material changes a controlled decision
If a supplier proposes an alternate alloy, condition or stock source, request a clear statement of the substitution. Have the responsible design authority approve it before release when approval is required. Keep the revised drawing or purchase instruction connected to the order. A material that machines more conveniently is not automatically acceptable for the part's strength, corrosion, temperature or contractual requirements.
ATM's owner-supplied capability information lists machining of steel and aluminum alloys through titanium and Inconel. It does not establish a blanket approval for every alloy, condition, special process or customer program. Use the materials and machining overview and equipment register as the starting point for a part-specific discussion. [1]
Send an RFQ with the material questions answered
Include the controlled drawing and model, exact material specification, supplied condition, final condition, quantity and delivery requirements. State whether stock is customer-supplied and attach the relevant material documentation through an agreed channel. Identify outside processes, processor restrictions, final inspection requirements and the required records.
Highlight any unresolved material callout rather than filling the gap with an assumption. Then ask ATM to review the material and manufacturing route. A clear quote should identify what is included, what needs confirmation and how the finished part will be accepted.
Questions before you quote
Can machinability be reduced to one score?
A score can describe a particular test or reference, but it does not replace review of the alloy, condition, geometry, tooling and process.
Is 17-4 PH a complete material callout?
No. Include the governing specification and required condition, along with applicable procurement and traceability requirements.
Should heat treatment be included in the RFQ?
Yes. Identify the supplied and final conditions, responsibility for the operation, processor restrictions and required records.
Sources and technical basis
General guidance is grounded in the references below. Your drawing, contract and agreed inspection plan govern the job; listed machine dimensions are not a part acceptance guarantee.
- ATM equipment register and owner-supplied capability brief (reviewed November 5, 2026)
- Sandvik Coromant: Workpiece Materials and machinability
- NIST: Machining Process Measurements, a Titanium Machining Example
- Special Metals: INCONEL Alloy 718 technical bulletin
- Carpenter Technology: Custom 630 Project 70+ (17-4), condition-specific data